Browsing Tag

God

Pentecost 2b

The Power of Small Things

There seems to be a trend in technology: nano.  Everything smaller, thinner, and powerful.  We even have the Ipod nano.  Growing up in Gaithersburg, MD we had the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST).  Many people from my home church worked there and one gentlemen even had a PhD in nano technology.  He would tell me about things working on sub atomic levels!  I  have a netbook computer that is small enough to fit into my pocket of my cargo pants.  We are coming out the era of “bigger and better” that we inherited from the 1950’s where cars were as big as boats and ladies had big hair.  We are entering into the age of “small things”.

In our two lectionary passages this week, we see that there is power in small things.  First, we have 1 Samuel, where Samuel is grieving over King Saul’s removal from power.  God instructs Samuel to invite Jesse and his sons to the sacrifice.  One of his sons would become God’s anointed and would lead all of Israel.  As the sons of Jesse are presented and none of them, not even the oldest, was the one that would be anointed.  There was one son missing, David who was the smallest and the youngest.  He was ruddy (my nickname), handsome, and full of life.  You can imagine the shock that the brothers and their father felt when Samuel anointed the smallest and youngest son.

In our second passage, we find in Mark 4, Jesus is comparing the ability of a small muster seed to grow into a mighty plant to the amazing nature of planting seeds of spiritual growth within people and reaping the enormous spiritual benefits within the Kingdom of God.  I always thought it was funny that Jesus talked about “shrubs”.  When I think of shrubs, I always think of Monty Python and the evil knights who say “Ni!” asking for shrubbery. Continue Reading…

Churches

Mega Church, Not So Mega Committment

Several news outlets, including the Associated Press and USA Today, are reporting today on a new study published by the the Hartford Institute for Religion Research at Hartford Seminary and Leadership Network that found some surprising trends in mega-churches.  In the study they found:

  • Nearly two-thirds of megachurch attenders are under 45 years old, as compared to only one-third for all Protestant churches (62% vs. 35%).
  • Nearly a third of megachurch attenders are single, unmarried persons.  In a typical church, singles account for just 10% of the congregation.
  • Megachurch attenders are both more educated and more affluent than attenders at other churches.
  • The majority of megachurch attenders are not necessarily new to Christianity but nearly a quarter had not recently been in another church before coming to a megachurch.
  • While newcomers almost always attend a megachurch at the invitation of family, friends or co-workers, the real attraction tends to be the church’s reputation, worship style and senior pastor.
  • Long-term attendance flows from an appreciation for the church’s music/arts, social and community outreach and adult-oriented programs.
  • 45% of megachurch attenders never volunteer at the church, and 40 percent are not engaged in a small group, the mainstay of megachurch programming.

As I have commented in the past, mega churches are meeting a need and are leading to people to Jesus Christ.  Two awesome things.  However, this study of 25,000 people at 12 mega churches indicates that megachurch attenders volunteer less and give less money than people who attend typical Protestant churches, although megachurch-goers tend to be wealthier and better educated. This follows the greater cultural trend of people being less committed to things because of their other commitments.  We are over committed and give less energy to our commitments.  For megachurches, this is problematic because it shows that attendees are less commitment to the church and they are not commitment enough to their stewardship through tithing or giving.  Mega churches draw in mega amounts of giving, so it leads me to believe that they can survive on less giving per member.

Continue Reading…

NFL

The Celebrities I Met & What I Learned About Their Faith

 

Ben Roethlisberger

Ben Roethlisberger

Earlier this year, a friend and a parishioner at my former church in Maryland asked me if I would like to give the invocation prayer again at the National Football League’s Players Gala and James Brown Awards.  Last year, I gave the invocation prayer at the event and got to meet James Brown (of CBS Sports), Bill Cower (former coach of the Pittsburg Steelers and Super Bowl winning coach), and other NFL players who were nominated for the “JB Award” for outstanding community involvement.  The gala also serves as a fundraiser for the Special Olympics.  This year, I happily accepted the invitation again and got to meet Ben Roethlisberger (Pittsburg Steelers Quarterback and Super Bowl Champion), Clinton Portis (Washington Redskin running back and Pro-Bowl starter), and Larry Fitzgerald (Arizona Cardinal wide receiver and Pro-Bowl MVP).

As I was traveling to the event, I could not help but wonder what place does a prayer have at a professional sports fundraiser and award show?  Sure, as a pastor I believe that we should desire to acknowledge God at these functions, but what do professional athletes think about prayer and invoking the name of God publicly?  Do these men of mega strength actively seek God out?  Sometimes after professional sports games on television players will mention God in passing as if God was a mere minor character in the player’s life.  Or during an interview, when professional athletes mention God more specifically and in great length the interviewer will cut off the athlete move on to more “important” facets of the game such as what edge the athlete had or what the athlete did before the game.  Still, some acknowledge “The Almighty”, “God”, or just “being blessed” but rarely mention “Jesus.”  In my mind, NFL players were not known for putting Christ as the center of their lives, either privately or publicly.

As I walked around the gala at the Washington D.C. Hilton and started to meet and take pictures with the players, I introduced myself and

John Riggins

John Riggins

mentioned my role in the program.  Most players did not say much, but they did allow me to take a picture with them.  As the time ticked down to my brief moment of prayer, I was ushered backstage and waited for my cue.  As I was waiting, I saw James Brown (J.B.) of CBS Sports, who is the driving force behind recognizing NFL Players and their community involvement at the event.  I decided to introduce myself and what I was doing there.  J.B., a former football player, affectionately embraced me and started to share with me in great length about his involvement with local pastors, local churches, prayer, accountability partners, and working with other religious organizations.  He also opened up about his faith in Christ.

J.B. also said something that got my attention.  In a very humble way, he said, “You know, what we do out there is something that is done only by the Holy Spirit.  You and I, do this for His sake, not ours.” Wow!  Here is a celebrity acknowledging the Holy Spirit.   He continued to speak about his faith in Christ and he said he enjoyed our time together as fellow brothers in Christ.  He also inquired about my journey with God, my ministry, my connection with the event, and my collegiate career in lacrosse.

Continue Reading…

trinity

The Trinity: 3 = 1 and 1 = 3

Math has never been a strong subject for me.  I remember dreading  algebra, geometry (not that bad), and algebra II (got C’s and past, barely).  I took at practical math class my senior year in high school where I learn to balance a check book, learned about mortgages, understood the stock market, and all sorts of practical  mathematical concepts.  I got A’s in that class!  The issue I found with mathematics is that the vast majority of equations and problems you have to solve have one answer.  For some reason, my mind was more suited to the humanities like government, history, art, and english (sort of).  In those classes, the answer was usually subjective.   In the humanity classes, thinking and discussing were at the center of learning.  Memorizing math formulas and the rules of math was difficult.  Every time I got a concept in math class we would move on to another concept.  I could not keep up!

Theologically, there is a mathematical concept that has confused scholars, thinkers, and Christians for centuries.  The Triune God: 3 = 1 and 1 = 3.  We Christians are not polytheistic in our beliefs, but many non-Christians are confused by our math.  Many non-Christians see three separate Gods: The Father, The Son, and the Holy Spirit.  How can Christians be monotheistic?

Well, in the 3rd and 4th centuries, Christians were  struggling with their monotheistic concepts with the unity of The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.  Without getting into the history of the Trinitarian debate there were a few guys who seemed to solve the problem.  The Cappadocian Fathers gave us the understanding of “three hypostases and one ousia.”  This means that there are three substances, but one essence of God.  The Cappadocian Fathers stated that the Godhead (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) exists simultaneously in three modes of being, but are one in essence and unity. They have one nature and one is not subordinate to another.

Confused?  Think about it this one.  The properties of water have three modes or states.  Water can be a liquid, a gas, or a solid.  Water flows as a liquid, can be a vapor as gas, or can be frozen as a solid.  No matter what you do with water it is still water.  The properties change, but water remains as water even though it takes three different modes.  The same can be said of the Trinity.  God is still God, but just in three forms that share similar properties made up of one substance.  It’s crazy, I know.  Similes and metaphors get us close to an idea, but never fully explain it.   Trying to explain God is like trying to explain an emotion.  Words that can fully describe it.  How do you describe the Divine?  How do you describe something greater than ourselves?   We have some pretty good ways of describing God, but nothing can fully explain God.  There is a certain mystery there that we are meant to be in awe of.

In John 3, Jesus is trying to explain to Nicodemus the relationship of the Triune God and how he must be “born of water and Spirit”.  (John 3:5)  As a Jew, Nicodemus was under the covenant of Abraham and was “saved”.  Jesus seeks to introduce the new covenant of Christ’s sacrifice as the Son, the need to be born of the Holy Spirit through baptism, and understanding how the Father sent the Son out of love.  These were all new concepts to Nicodemus and that is why he asks, “How can anyone be born after having grown old?”  (John 3:4)   We, like Nicodemus, sometimes are confused by all the theology.  We need help to understand it.   Though we may struggle, Jesus made one thing clear: “For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life.” (John 3:16)

As we gather on this Trinity Sunday, I pray you will think about how the Trinity is an important understanding as a Christian.  We should seek to understand how the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are all God.  They are all unified, but each has distinct roles.  How have you connected with the Triune God?  Do you tend to focus on one and not the other?  How do you incorporate the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in your worship, devotional time, and your life?   Last Sunday was Pentecost.  How does the Holy Spirit (often the ignored member of the Trinity) work in my life?

For more information regarding the Christian Calendar go here and here.  For information on Trinity Sunday go here.

For more information on the Trinity check out these books:

worship

Does My Church Look Like a Warehouse?

For the last 20 or 25 years, it has become popular a church to build their worship and ministry space to look like a warehouse or storehouse (or use an actual warehouse).  After being a part of three capital improvement projects at three different churches, I have found there is a whole theology to church buildings.

The “Emergent” or “Emerging Church” and ultra contemporary church movement has found that many people are attracted to buildings that do not include religious symbols.  And, church buildings  should be more utilitarian than religious. Most of the time, building a church in a warehouse is an economical way to do church.   Aside from the  “store front” church, churches who desire to tone down a worship space do so for marketing reasons.  Mega and ultra contemporary churches try to draw in burned out Christians or seekers (the unchurched) who want church to be different than the traditional church service (3 hymns, sermon, and altar call).

Christianity Today wrote an intriguing article about how there is now a reverse trend in trying to attract seekers to churches.  The trend seems to be that now seekers and churches are reconsidering what they thought they wanted in a church building.  The article cites a survey which states that seekers  prefer a church to look like, well… a church.   The article reads:

….unchurched adults prefer Gothic church buildings to utilitarian ones, challenging the conventional wisdom that medieval-looking churches feel out-of-touch and stuffy to seekers.  LifeWay showed over 1,600 unchurched adults four pictures of church buildings, ranging from mall-like to Gothic. The majority preferred the most ornate church.

Not exactly scientific, but this survey shows that deep down inside, a church’s building says a lot about how the church sees itself regarding theology, evangelism, and Christ.  This study came out of  LifeWay, the publishing and ministry arm of the Southern Baptist Convention.

It is my firm belief that people want to seek the Divine in church community and in worship.  Based on anecdotal evidence, I have found that there is a segment of the church going population, who after several years at a ultra contemporary/mega church, desire to recapture the essence of what it means to worship, learn, live in faith, and fellowship in a congregation that seeks to be more dynamic and deeper in their approach.  Over the years, I have been a big fan of Robert Webber, who died recently.  Webber who began life as a Baptist and then switched denominations to become an Episcopalian, rediscovered liturgical worship with a contemporary twist.  In his book, Ancient-Future Faith he states:

Worship Renewal, then, is not a matter of gimmicks, but the recovery of the Christian vision of reality enacted by the community of God.  pg. 32

Then, Webber goes on to say:

In the 1980’s evangelicals sought to neutralize space to make the seeker more comfortable.  This worked in the 1980’s but is not the way to go in the postmodern world.  The inquirer needs to be immersed within a space that bespeaks the Christian faith.  The very narrative of faith which we seek to know and live is symbolically expressed in our space… Space becomes the visual image of the connection between the known and unknown. pg. 108

For Webber, and I agree, worship and our church buildings communicate who God is.  Symbols are important.  Symbols point to a great reality.  The cross is a symbol.  The communion table is a symbol.  The church is a symbol.  If we neutralize a church space, then are we neutralizing the symbol of the church?   Postmodernity has indeed reshaped our understanding.  Webber addresses the church within postmodernity:

In a postmodern world that has become increasingly interested in communication and space, it will be necessary to feature the relational seating of God people around the symbols of water, the pulpit, and the Table.  These are the primary visual images of God’s work in the history of salvation. pg. 108

I have a number of engaged couples who come from other churches looking for a church to get married in because their church does not “look” like a church.  They do not worship in a traditional looking church, but they want to get married in one.  That just shows how our culture is evolving and how Christians view worship space.

Churches and pastors should resist the empty showy gimmicks and trendy ideas about church and worship.  Instead, we must seek to put a theology behind our church and church buildings instead of only relying on marketing tactics.  There is a richness contained in the 2,000 years of worship, teaching, and theology that the church mothers and fathers have given to us.   There is nothing “wrong” with a contemporary church that meets in a warehouse, but the trend of the lack of Christian symbols and lack of focus upon theologically centered worship space is troubling.   When churches are able, they should think about building or obtaining a worship space that reflects Christian theology.  I should make it clear that many people have come to Christ in these trendy churches and these churches are meeting a need.   But, at some point, people are going to want more than flashy lights, loud bands, and Starbucks.

What do you think?

On Facebook