When does art cease to be art? Where do we draw the line? Case in point: A naked street performer took a ride on a moped with a cross. The artist called his performance art. That has some Christians up in arms. Unfortunately, someone took pictures.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a502/1a502772a32d76145cb0d274e67e84c54057a631" alt=""
This dude must be Superman to carry a cross of that size.
And then there’s this one:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eced/5eced59fbdce3f1c6e220b17e1644595851cb249" alt=""
Again, super human strength.
Brian Ashcraft incorrectly identified a cross is a crucifix. A crucifix is a cross with Jesus on it. A cross is without a dying Jesus. (The word “Crucifix” comes from Latin word, cruci fixus meaning “one fixed to a cross”.)
So, what would drive someone to do this? The performer said,
“Every time I finish a run, I always check online to see what people online are saying about me,” said Li. “The internet creates such a wonderful way to interact, and I really want to see what others think of this thing I’m doing. It makes conversation online.”
So, is this art or sacrilege? Comment below via Facebook or Disqus.
No Comments